Pakistan-India Clashes Reveal Chinese Technology to the World

In a region historically characterized by rivalries and the persistent threat of nuclear capability, the skies over South Asia have once more transformed into a war, but with an unforeseen development. The recent military conflict between Pakistan and India, characterized by intense aerial engagements and advanced weaponry, provided the world with an unparalleled insight into the future of warfare. For the first instance, Chinese military equipment confronted Western-manufactured armaments in authentic combat scenarios. The result, evidenced by the destruction of Indian jets and Pakistan’s successful counterattacks, reverberated throughout international defence communities.
A report by CNN indicates that the heightened tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours constituted the inaugural real-world evaluation of Chinese military technology in comparison to superior Western systems. The outcomes were revealing and profitable. Stocks of Chinese defence companies surged after the incident, reflecting revitalized investor confidence in Beijing’s expanding defence sector. Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group, a division of the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), experienced a 40 percent increase in its stock within a matter of days. This increase followed Pakistan’s reported destruction of five Indian aircraft, comprising three French-made Rafales, a Russian MiG-29, and a Su-30, utilizing the Chinese-made J-10C fighter jet.
When interrogated over the occurrence, the Chinese Foreign Ministry maintained a diplomatically cautious stance, asserting a deficiency of comprehensive information. Nonetheless, their reticence did little to conceal Beijing’s intense interest in the performance of its equipment in actual combat scenarios. As Pakistan’s principal arms supplier, China has a vested interest in the performance of its equipment in contemporary battlefields, particularly as it aims to broaden its worldwide arms market.
Under President Xi Jinping, China’s military capabilities have expanded significantly, with substantial investments made in the modernization of the People’s Liberation Army. Although China has not participated in a significant fight for almost forty years, it has demonstrated its capabilities via joint exercises, sophisticated weapons development, and strategic alliances. One of the most significant partnerships is with Pakistan, which Beijing frequently designates as its “iron brother.”
In the preceding five years, more than 81 percent of Pakistan’s imported armaments have originated from China. These encompass fighter aircraft, air defence systems, precision-guided munitions, and observation radars. Certain systems were collaboratively created, shown by the JF-17 Thunder, but others were constructed domestically in Pakistan utilizing Chinese schematics. This partnership has enhanced Islamabad’s military capabilities and provided China with an opportunity to evaluate and showcase its assets in live combat scenarios.
Sajjan Gohal, director of international security at the Asia Pacific Foundation in London, characterized the scenario as a “practical laboratory” for Chinese defence exports. It is uncommon for a nation such as China, primarily inexperienced in active conflict zones, to have its equipment compared with NATO-standard armaments. Pakistan’s provision of this stage elevates the stakes significantly, encompassing both military achievement and economic potential.
The strong relationship between the two nations has been reinforced by various cooperative military exercises, encompassing air, naval, and ground combat simulations. These exercises frequently use advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence-driven target recognition and autonomous mission planning. Craig Singleton of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies asserts that “Pakistan’s procurement of Chinese technology, training, and now AI-enhanced marksmanship has altered the regional power dynamics.”
This transition was starkly illustrated during the confrontations in early May 2025. Violence ensued after a severe event resulting in civilian casualties in Indian-administered Kashmir. India conducted airstrikes deep within Pakistani territory, utilizing French Rafale and Russian Su-30 aircraft. In response, Pakistan executed a coordinated air defence operation, deploying over 125 aircraft, and effectively downed five Indian jets with Chinese J-10Cs and the collaboratively built JF-17 Thunder.
Salman Ali Battani, a scholar at Quaid-e-Azam University, characterized the engagement as “the most intense aerial conflict ever waged between two nuclear-armed states.” Although Indian officials were hesitant to acknowledge their losses, a source from the French Ministry of defence admitted that at least one Rafale was destroyed. This acknowledgment carries significant ramifications, not only for India’s defence credibility but also for Western armament makers who have historically promoted their products as superior to Eastern counterparts.
Bilal Khan, the founder of the Canadian defence analysis firm Cova Group, stated that “this will demonstrate that Pakistan’s weaponry is comparable to the most advanced armaments in the West.” Chinese nationalists and defence specialists on social media lauded the J-10C’s performance as a testament to Chinese engineering excellence. The stock market appeared to concur, as AVIC Chengdu’s share price surged 17 percent in one day on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, followed by an additional 20 percent increase the subsequent day.
The J-10C, a 4.5-generation fighter aircraft, epitomizes the zenith of China’s contemporary aerospace engineering. The aircraft is outfitted with an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, sophisticated avionics, and long-range missiles such as the PL-15, providing capabilities that compete with Western equivalents. In 2022, Pakistan acquired its inaugural shipment of J-10CE fighters, which today constitute the core of its advanced fighter fleet alongside the JF-17 Thunder Block III.
For Chinese defence specialists such as Zhu Bo, the downing of the Rafale represented not merely a tactical triumph but also a psychological and financial success. Zhu stated, “The destruction of the Rafale by the J-10C aircraft will significantly enhance confidence in Chinese defence exports.” He stated that nations once dependent on Western weaponry may now reevaluate their acquisition methods.
The repercussions of the conflict are already impacting the global armaments market. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) observes that although the United States continues to lead global arms exports, representing 43 percent of the market from 2020 to 2024, China’s importance is increasing. Despite ranking fourth, two-thirds of China’s exports are presently directed to Pakistan. This situation may soon alter if additional nations in the Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia perceive Chinese weaponry as economical and dependable substitutes for Western systems.
Bilal Khan asserts that nations lacking access to Western technology, whether owing to political affiliations or financial limitations, may now seek alternatives from China. For these nations, the J-10C’s performance may function as a definitive proof-of-concept.
Craig Singleton warns that “war involves more than merely procuring aircraft; it is an evaluation of cohesive strategy, training, and combat proficiency.” This underscores Pakistan’s comprehensive military strategy, which has progressively prioritized interoperability, rapid deployment, and precise engagement, frequently with the guidance and assistance of Chinese military advisors.
Additionally, defence specialist Fabian Hoffmann from the University of Oslo indicated that India might have miscalculated the capabilities of Pakistan’s PL-15 missiles, potentially presuming that Islamabad possessed only export-restricted variants. This miscalculation may have compelled Indian aircraft into precarious positions during the engagement.
The geopolitical ramifications of the Indo-Pak air confrontation are notably substantial. Since 1947, the two nations have engaged in three significant conflicts, primarily around the disputed territory of Kashmir. Throughout the Cold War, India aligned itself with the Soviet Union, but Pakistan cultivated relationships with the United States and China. Today, the terrain has undergone a significant transformation. India, previously a proponent of non-alignment, has strengthened its ties with the United States by acquiring armaments from France, Israel, and the United States. Conversely, Pakistan has fortified its strategic partnership with China, now intricately linked through military collaboration and infrastructural investments under the Belt and Road Initiative.
SIPRI indicates that Pakistan previously received approximately equal military assistance from the United States and China. Following the reduction of U.S. weaponry deliveries in the 2010s, China intervened to occupy the gap, solidifying its status as Pakistan’s primary defence ally.
The Indo-Pak air confrontation of May 2025 signifies more than a regional conflict; it represents a pivotal event in the changing global security paradigm. Chinese weaponry demonstrated its efficacy for the first time in actual combat against some of the most sophisticated Western-manufactured aircraft. The result, distinctly advantageous for Pakistan’s Chinese-equipped military, carries substantial ramifications for military strategists, global weapons markets, and geopolitical alignments.
This was not merely a conflict between two opposing nations; it was an exhibition of trust in technology over brute force, and of strategic alliances over superficial rhetoric. As Pakistan advances its military capabilities with assistance from China, global attention remains focused. It is now unequivocal that Chinese defence technology has emerged on the global stage, not via parades or propaganda, but via actual, high-stakes warfare. It has had a significant impact.

Author

  • Dr Hussain Jan

    Hussain Jan is a student of Strategic Studies and is currently pursuing a PhD at the University of Bradford, United Kingdom. His academic interests lie in international security, geopolitical dynamics, and conflict resolution, with a particular focus on Europe. He has contributed to various research forums and academic discussions related to global strategic affairs, and his work often explores the intersection of policy, defence strategy, and regional stability.

#pf-body #pf-header-img{max-height:100%;} #pf-body #pf-title { margin-bottom: 2rem; margin-top: 0; font-size: 24px; padding: 30px 10px; background: #222222; color: white; text-align: center; border-radius: 5px;}#pf-src{display:none;}